FedTALLY

Awards for “THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION

25 awards on this page · sorted by amount · page 43

Award IDRecipientAwarding agencyAmountStartEndNAICSDescription
80ARC023F0004THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$20.06K
2022-11-082024-01-26541715THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERING/SCIENTIFIC SERVICES TO INCLUDE LAB/CLEANROOM EXPERTISE, PLANETARY PROTECTION, CONTAMINATION/STERILITY CONTROL, INSTRUMENT INTEGRATION/TEST PLANNING, SYS ENG, SAFETY PLANNING, AND FACILITY ANALYSIS.
NNM13AA54TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$20.02K
2013-09-102014-02-28541690IGF::OT::IGF AEROSPACE,DEVELOPMENT OF REVISION A OF AIAA S-120-2006, MASS PROPERTIES CONTROL OF SPACE SYSTEMS
80ARC020F0024THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$19.99K
2020-01-232021-05-31541715THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERING/SCIENTIFIC SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF CISLUNAR AUTONOMOUS POSITIONING SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS AND NAVIGATION EXPERIMENT (CAPSTONE) TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION MISSION (TDM) REVIEWS.
80GRC019F0167THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$19.68K
2019-08-272019-09-30541712NASA GRC NEXTGEN COMM EARTH RELAY MISSION FORMULATION STUDIES
80HQTR23F0055THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$19.25K
2023-04-132023-05-31541715THE NASA HELIOPHYSICS DIVISION (HPD) OF THE SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE (SMD) IS SUPPORTING HELIOPHYSICS SYSTEM OBSERVATORY MISSIONS THAT ARE OPERATING BEYOND THEIR PRIME MISSION LIFETIMES.
DTRTVT0023THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Transportation$19.23K
2009-10-162010-09-30541710RLV PILOT TRAJECTORY IMPACT
80HQTR19F0249THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$18.83K
2019-07-242019-09-30541712SEEDLING ACCELERATOR STUDY SUPPORT IN SUPPORT OF THE NASA HQ OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST
SPE5E917V4558AEROSPACE CORPORATION, THEDepartment of Defense$17.94K
2017-05-162017-08-143325108504406440!CLAMP,LOOP
NNL08AC46TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$17.91K
2008-06-182008-09-30541330WISE EHANCEMENT FOR NEAR-EARTH OBJECT INVESTIGATION
NNL17AA65TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$17.64K
2017-04-172017-08-31541330IGF::OT::IGF " NASA ENGINEERING AND SAFETY CENTER ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL (EEE) PARTS TESTING FOR COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM (CCP) SUPPORT " - THE SCOPE OF THIS EFFORT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO ASSIST IN EVALUATING THE COMMERCIAL AND AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EEE PARTS IDENTIFIED FROM THE NESC AVIONICS ARCHITECTURE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEWING TEST DATA FROM DESTRUCTIVE PHYSICAL ANALYSIS (DPA) REPORTS, ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIATION TESTING REPORTS AND PRODUCTION PARTS APPROVAL PROCESS (PPSP) DOCUMENTS.
80MSFC19F0055THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$17.6K
2019-05-022019-07-31541712TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENTS SERVICES FOR THE SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM AND THE LYNX ROADMAP PROJECT
80GRC020F0079THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$17.53K
2020-02-132020-04-30541715NEXT-C THRUST VECTOR ASSESSMENT
SPE4A617PD128AEROSPACE CORPORATION, THEDepartment of Defense$17.46K
2017-05-092017-08-073399918504384653!GASKET
NNG15VN60TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$17.17K
2015-06-192015-08-31541712IGF::OT::IGF EARTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE (ESTO) SUPPORT FOR IN-SPACE VALIDATION OF EARTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES (INVEST) 2015 PROPOSAL REVIEW. THE EARTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE (ESTO) HAS RESPONSIBILITY TO DEFINE, IMPLEMENT, AND INTEGRATE ACROSS MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES A TECHNOLOGY-DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR THE SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE (SMD), EARTH SCIENCE DIVISION, (ESD). THE EARTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY OFFICE ESTO S TECHNOLOGY ACTIVITIES ENCOMPASS THE AREAS OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR INSTRUMENTS, COMPONENTS, AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS. THESE THRUST AREAS REQUIRE STATE-OF-THE-ART EXPERTISE IN DISCIPLINES SUCH AS DETECTORS, COMPONENTS, DATA SYSTEMS FOR INSTRUMENTS, LAUNCH VEHICLE OPTIONS AND CAPABILITIES, AIRCRAFT, BALLOONS, CUBESATS, IN SITU PLATFORMS, DATA CAPTURE AND PROCESSING, SENSOR WEBS, AND AUTONOMOUS-OPERATION TECHNOLOGIES. ADDITIONALLY, NASA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENTS (NRAS), BROAD AGENCY (BAAS), REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION (RFIS), AND OTHER SOLICITATIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE VARIOUS PROGRAM AREAS. VALIDATION OF EARTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN SPACE WILL HELP REDUCE THE RISK OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN FUTURE EARTH SCIENCE MISSIONS. THIS SOLICITATION CALLS FOR INSTRUMENTS, INSTRUMENT SUBSYSTEMS, ONBOARDING PROCESSING OR OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES THAT CAN MAKE OR ADVANCE THE TECHNOLOGY TO ENABLE TO RELEVANT EARTH SCIENCE MEASUREMENTS. BE AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE SCHEDULED DUE DATES. THE REVIEWER SHALL ALSO HAVE SUFFICIENT QUALIFICATION TO COMPLETE EACH ASSIGNED REVIEW. PERFORM AN OBJECTIVE REVIEW OF THE ASSIGNED PROPOSALS. PARTICIPATE IN THE PANEL REVIEW INCLUDES ACT AS LEAD REVIEWER FOR UP TO 6 PROPOSALS. READ UP TO FOUR ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN DISCUSSIONS DURING PANEL REVIEW AS APPROPRIATE. THE CONTRACTOR WILL MANAGE THE WORK TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDING ENTRY OF RESULTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ON/OFF-SITE PROJECT AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INDEPENDENT TESTING, CONTRACTOR-ON-SITE MONITORING, AND INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF PROJECTS AND/OR PROGRAMS, INCLUDING COST, SCHEDULE, AND AFFORDABILITY ANALYSES, IN ANY PHASE OF THE LIFE-CYCLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROVIDE LEADERSHIP OR STAFFING FOR FOCUSED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, ADVANCED SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INDEPENDENT REVIEWS OF ALL ABOVE ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. THESE SERVICES SHALL INCLUDE THE PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, AND MATERIALS (UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THE GOVERNMENT) TO ACCOMPLISH THE TASKS. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDE KNOWLEDGEABLE AND INDEPENDENT ANALYSTS AND REVIEWERS TO SUPPORT SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF THESE ACTIVITIES.
SPE4A517P6538AEROSPACE CORPORATION, THEDepartment of Defense$16.51K
2017-05-112017-07-103329998504377737!PLUG, MACHINE THREAD, MAGNETI
80HQTR21F0172THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$16.22K
2021-06-242021-12-24541715NASA SEEKS TO OBTAIN A WORKING PROTOTYPE OF AN INDEPENDENT SCHEDULE ASSESSMENT TOOL IN ORDER TO MORE EFFECTIVELY ASSESS PROJECT AND MISSION SCHEDULES.
NNM11AA31TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$16.01K
2011-02-142013-03-03541611"LUNAR QUEST PROGRAM OFFICE LUNAR ATMOSPHERE AND DUST ENVIRONMENT EXPLORER (LADEE) EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT".
80GSFC18F0035THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$15.75K
2017-11-302018-09-30541712IGF::OT:IGF NASAS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION IV V FACILITY WAS ESTABLISHED AS PART OF AN AGENCY WIDE STRATEGY TO PROVIDE THE HIGHEST ACHIEVABLE LEVELS OF SAFETY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS FOR MISSION CRITICAL SOFTWARE. INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION IS AN AGENCY LEVEL FUNCTION DELEGATED FROM OSMA TO GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GSFC AND MANAGED BY NASA IV V. THE PROGRAMS PRIMARY BUSINESS SOFTWARE IV V IS SPONSORED BY OSMA AS A SOFTWARE ASSURANCE TECHNOLOGY. THE NASA IV V PROGRAMS ANALYTICAL APPROACHES ENABLE EFFICIENT COST EFFECTIVE IV V SERVICE THROUGH THE USAGE OF BROAD BASED EXPERTISE ADAPTIVE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES AND A COMMON TOOLSET FOR ALL IV V ANALYSTS. THE ANALYTICAL PARADIGM UTILIZED BY NASAS IV V PROGRAM REQUIRES A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM AND A QUALITATIVE SOFTWARE RISK AND CRITICALITY ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY COUPLED WITH AN EXTENSIVE MULTIPHASE V V ANALYTICAL PROCESS. NASAS IV V PROGRAM IS ACCREDITED TO PERFORM INSPECTIONS AS A THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT ORGANIZATION 3PAO UNDER THE FEDERAL RISK AND AUTHORIZATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEDRAMP WWW.FEDRAMP.GOV. THIS ACCREDITATION ENABLES THE PROGRAM TO CERTIFY CLOUD SERVICES THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED TO GOVERNMENT ENTITIES WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE PROGRAMS DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE IN CYBERSECURITY. THIS STATEMENT OF WORK SOW IS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NASAS IV V PROGRAM IVVP. THE FOLLOWING LIST OF TASKS IS NOT NECESSARILY EXHAUSTIVE BUT INDICATES THE TYPES OF TASKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION SPACE CYBER RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT CYBER TESTING AND ASSESSMENT SUPPORT AND AS NEEDED SPECIAL STUDIES AND ALTERNATIVE ANALYSES INDEPENDENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS, ACQUISITION RECOMMENDATIONS AND INDEPENDENT PROGRAM REVIEWS THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFINE THE DIRECTION OF TASKS AND ADD ADDITIONAL TASKS WITHIN THE GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER. TASKS OUTSIDE THE GENERAL SCOPE OR FOR WHICH THE TECHNICAL DIRECTION CLAUSE CANNOT APPLY WILL BE INCORPORATED FOLLOWING A BILATERAL AGREEMENT.
80ARC025F7004THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$15.73K
2024-11-042025-01-31541715THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING SERVICES TO INFORM A RECOMMENDATION OF BATTERY PASSIVATION TECHNIQUES BEING ADOPTED BY ACADEMIA, INDUSTRY, AND OTHER GOVT AGENCIES AS PART OF CONTINUAL PROCESS IMPROVEMENT/REQUIREMENT REVISIONS.
NNH13CI18DTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$15.48K
2013-04-262013-07-26541712IGF::OT::IGF NASA HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTING JOINT CONFIDENCE LEVEL (JCL) SINCE 2009. JCL FORMAL POLICY, AS WRITTEN IN NPR 7120.5E, STATES THAT PROJECTS ARE REQUIRED TO PERFORM A JCL WITH THE INTENT THAT PROJECTS COME IN AT 70% CONFIDENCE. THIS 70% CONFIDENCE IS LOOSELY BASED ON WORK PERFORMED BY CAD TO UNDERSTAND THE PORTFOLIO EFFECT OF FUNDING PROJECTS PROBABILISTICALLY WITH ONLY RESPECT TO COST. STUDY WOULD BUILD ON EXISTING WORK TO PARAMETRICALLY INVESTIGATE THE EFFECT OF FUNDING PROJECTS AT DIFFERENT CONFIDENCE LEVELS TO EXAMINE IF THERE IS AN OPTIMAL CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO FUND A PORTFOLIO OF MISSIONS. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS ON 3 HYPOTHETICAL PORTFOLIOS. A. PORTFOLIO THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC OF CURRENT ENVIRONMENT B. PORTFOLIO THAT IS FLAGSHIP CENTRIC C. PORTFOLIO WHERE PROJECTS ARE ALL PROJECTS ARE RELATIVITY EQUAL IN SIZE 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE SAND CHART TOOL, AN EXISTING METHODOLOGY DEVELOPED FOR PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS, TO MODEL PORTFOLIOS THAT WOULD BE VARIED PARAMETRICALLY FROM 50% TO 90% IN 5% INCREMENTS TO DETERMINE WHICH PROJECT CONFIDENCE LEVEL POSTURE PERFORMS THE BEST PORTFOLIO EFFECT. PORTFOLIO EFFECTS WILL BE MEASURED AS FOLLOWS: A. EQUAL CONTENT, VARIABLE COST: COST TO IMPLEMENT ALL TOTAL PORTFOLIO B. EQUAL CONTENT, VARIABLE TIME: TIME TO LAUNCH TOTAL PORTFOLIO C. EQUAL TIME, VARIABLE CONTENT: NUMBER OF MISSIONS LAUNCHED IN A X YEAR PERIOD D. PROGRAM VOLATILITY: PERCENTAGE OF TIME THAT MISSIONS EXCEED THE 15% COST GROWTH OR 6-MONTH SCHEDULE GROWTH THRESHOLD BREACH REQUIREMENT 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE (3) VARIOUS PROGRAM/DIRECTORATE RESERVE STRATEGIES. THIS TASK IS SIMILAR TO TASK 2, WITH THE AUGMENTATION THAT THERE WOULD BE A DIRECTORATE BANK THAT WOULD HOLD VALUES BETWEEN A PROTECT CONFIDENCE LEVEL AND THE ALLOCATED FUNDING CONFIDENCE LEVEL. THE STRATEGIES WILL BE MEASURED CONSISTENTLY AS TASK 2.
T0001THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Transportation$15.37K
2005-07-012006-09-30541710MPL FOR RLVS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL PERMIT
NNL10AB05TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$14.85K
2010-02-182010-05-14541330THIS TASK IS TO PROVIDE AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF THE COST AND RISK OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE OF THE AERIAL REGIONAL-SCALE ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYOR (ARES) MARS AIRPLANE CONCEPT. THE ARES MISSION CONCEPT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED TO THE MARS SCOUT PROGRAM AND HAS DETAILED COST ESTIMATES. IT IS DESIRED TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INDEPENDENT COST ASSESSMENTS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE COST, AND THE IMPACT OF THE ESTIMATED COMPLEXITY TO THE COST, OF THE ARES MISSION CONCEPT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF THE PROPOSAL TO THE DISCOVERY 2010 ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY. IT IS INTENDED THAT THIS COST ASSESSMENT CONSIST OF THREE ELEMENTS: 1. PERFORM A COST AND COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT OF THE ARES IMPLEMENTATION COST USING THE AEROSPACE COMPLEXITY BASED RISK ASSESSMENT (COBRA) TOOL 2. PERFORM A COST ASSESSMENT USING OTHER HIGHER FIDELITY MODELS AND TOOLS AND COMPARE THE RESULTS WITH THE COBRA RESULTS 3. PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT WITH THE RESULTS AND CONCL
NNL06AB62TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$14.49K
2006-04-072009-12-15541330RTAX-S FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAY (FPGA) RISK REDUCTION
DOCSB134112SE0256THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Commerce$13.83K
2012-02-242012-12-31541330NVLAP ASSESSMENT
80HQTR19F0289THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$13.74K
2019-10-012020-09-30541715INTER-AGENCY NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW PANEL (INSRP) FOR MARS 2020 NASA HQ OFFICE OF SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE