FedTALLY

Awards for “THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION

25 awards on this page · sorted by amount · page 40

Award IDRecipientAwarding agencyAmountStartEndNAICSDescription
NNH13CH65DTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$33.64K
2013-02-052013-09-30541712IGF::OT::IGF. TABLE TOOP EXERCISE FOR SHORT WARNING EVENT TO BE PREFORMED FOR NASA HQ SMD PLANETARY SCIENCE DIVISION NEO PROGRAM OFFICE. 1. WORK WITH NASA TO DEVELOP THE LOGISTICS FOR THE TABLETOP EXERCISE. THIS INCLUDES ESTABLISHING THE GENERAL FLOW OF THE EXERCISE, THE LIST OF INDIVIDUALS TO BE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE, THE MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED TO EACH PARTICIPANT BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER THE EXERCISE, THE LOCATION AND TIME OF THE EXERCISE, AND THE BASIC ASTEROID THREAT SCENARIO TO BE PRESENTED TO THE EXERCISE PARTICIPANTS. 2. LEAD AND COORDINATE EFFORTS OF THE EXPERTS FROM JPL, AEROSPACE, RAND, SANDIA, AND LLNL TO DEVELOP AND SCRIPT A COMPLETE SCENARIO TO BE PRESENTED TO EXERCISE PARTICIPANTS. THE SCRIPT WILL INCLUDE A KICK-OFF BRIEFING ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE INPUTS AND PROVIDING UPDATES REPRESENTATIVE OF UPDATES THE PARTICIPANTS WOULD BE PROVIDED AS THE THREAT EVOLVES (TRACKING DATA ADDS NEW DETAIL, ETC.). 3. MODIFY THE NEO MITIGATION MISSION DESIGN TOOL TO INCLUDE NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVES. THIS WEB-BASED TOOL WAS DEVELOPED BY JPL AND AEROSPACE TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY MISSION DESIGN CAPABILITIES AND WILL EVENTUALLY BE POSTED ON THE JPL WEB SITE FOR PUBLIC USE. THE TOOL CURRENTLY INCLUDES ONLY THE KINETIC IMPACT OPTION; A SIMPLE METHOD THAT MULTIPLIES THE MOMENTUM IMPARTED BY KINETIC IMPACT TO ACCOUNT FOR THE MOMENTUM IMPARTED BY A NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE WILL BE ADDED FOR THE TABLETOP EXERCISE. 4. PARTICIPATE IN AND LEAD THE EXERCISE. AEROSPACE INSTITUTE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH TABLETOP EXERCISES WILL ASSIST IN DESIGNING AND ADMINISTERING THE EXERCISE. (18 HOURS. NOTE: HOURS FOR AEROSPACE INSTITUTE PERSONNEL NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE OR CHARGED TO THIS PROJECT) 5. COORDINATE SUPPORT (BOTH ON-SITE AND CALL-IN) DURING THE EXERCISE PROVIDED BY EXPERTS. SINCE TIME AVAILABLE TO PREPARE THE EXERCISE DOES NOT ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF DETAILED SUPPORT INFORMATION, EXPERTS WILL UTILIZE EXISTING DATA ON LAUNCH VEHICLE AVAILABILITY, EXISTING TOOLS (E.G., THE AEROSPACE/JPL TOOL FOR DEFLECTING AN ASTEROID USING KINETIC IMPACTORS), AND EXISTING INFORMATION ON KINETIC IMPACTORS AND NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVES, AS WELL AS THE EFFECTS OF THESE TECHNIQUES ON AN ASTEROID, COMBINED WITH BEST JUDGMENT TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FROM PARTICIPANTS DURING THE EXERCISE.
NNA14AC11TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$33.32K
2014-07-292015-04-04541712IGF::OT::IGF INDEPENDENT COST AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATING SERVICES FOR DARK AGES RADIO EXPLORER (DARE) PROJECT.
NNL05AA08TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$32.73K
2004-11-172005-01-31541330EXTERNAL TANK "USE AS IS" FOAM CERTIFICATION ASSESSMENT
80HQTR26F7098THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$32.25K
2026-05-072027-05-06541715ON-SITE PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR SPACE TECHNOLOGY MISSION DIRECTORATE (STMD) FRONT OFFICE SUPPORT
NNL09AA84TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$32.11K
2009-01-162010-09-19541330EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE PATHFINDER (ESSP) PROGRAM OFFICE
693KA925F00012THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Transportation$31.85K
2024-11-012025-08-06541715SEAS PROJECT - REENTRY DEBRIS SURVIVABILITY SUPPORT
80LARC26F7029THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$31.63K
2026-08-052026-10-31541715JITTER ANALYSIS AND TEST ENGINEERING GUIDELINES HANDBOOK DEVELOPMENT
NNL11AB79TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.84K
2011-05-062011-09-30541330THE JWST PROGRAM IS DEVELOPING A VERY LARGE DEPLOYABLE INFRARED OBSERVATORY WHOSE 6.5-METER APERTURE MIRROR AND INSTRUMENTS WILL ALLOW IT TO DETECT LIGHT FROM WHAT ARE BELIEVED TO BE THE EARLIEST STARS IN THE UNIVERSE. THE 6.5 METER PRIMARY MIRROR CONSISTS OF 18 SEGMENTS THAT MUST BE DEPLOYED AND ALIGNED. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS OBJECTIVE, THE OBSERVATORY WILL BE PLACED IN ORBIT AT THE EARTH-SUN L-2 POINT AND THE TELESCOPE AND INSTRUMENT COMPLEMENT WILL OPERATE AT APPROXIMATELY 45 DEGREES KELVIN (-378 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT). THE SRB WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INDEPENDENTLY ASSESSING THE HEALTH OF THE PROJECT AT VARIOUS LIFE CYCLE GATES AND KEY DECISION POINTS (KDPS).
80HQTR21F0157THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.68K
2021-05-272021-11-27541715CONDUCT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS AND STUDIES, TO SUPPORT ESD EFFORTS. THESE STUDIES OR ASSESSMENTS MAY CONSIDER THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE EARTH SCIENCE OBSERVATORY RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2017 EARTH SCIENCE DECADAL.
NNM14AA16TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.61K
2014-03-132014-12-26541690IGF::OT::IGF AEROSPACE TASK #33, ENTITLED, "INDEPENDENT SUPPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF REVISION A OF AIAA S-120-2006, MASS PROPERTIES CONTROL FOR SPACE SYSTEMS, PART 2.
80GRC024F0029THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.34K
2024-03-142024-11-30541715CIVIL-MILITARY SPACE FISSION COMMUNITY ADVISORY SUPPORT TO HELP IDENTIFY POTENTIAL COLLABORATIONS, ISSUES THAT MIGHT ARISE DURING THEM, AND SOLUTIONS TO THOSE ISSUES.
NNG16VN73TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.08K
2016-08-012018-03-31541712IGF::OT::IGF LANDSAT 9 GSRT REVIEW SUPPORT PURPOSE, OBJECTIVE, AND BACKGROUND OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: PROVIDE SCHEDULING, PROJECT/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, AND MULTI-DISCIPLINE ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE LANDSAT 9 FLIGHT AND GROUND GSRTS. SUPPORT INCLUDES PRE-REVIEW ACTIVITIES (REVIEWING DOCUMENTS, TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETINGS, EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, AND TELECONFERENCES) AND POST-REVIEW ACTIVITIES [REQUEST FOR ACTION (RFA) DISPOSITION, TRIP REPORT DEVELOPMENT, TEAM CAUCUSES, TELECONFERENCES, AND FINAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW]. THE REVIEW TIMEFRAMES CONTAINED WITHIN THE SOW ARE ESTIMATED DATES ONLY. THE RESPONSIBLE GSFC SYSTEMS REVIEW MANAGER (SRM) WILL PROVIDE ACTUAL DATES IN ADVANCE OF THE REVIEWS FOR WHICH SUPPORT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROGRESSION THROUGH THE CURRENT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. REVIEWS ARE TO BE ATTENDED BY THE APPOINTED EXPERTS AS DIRECTED BY THE RESPONSIBLE SRM IN SUPPORT OF THE SYSTEMS REVIEW BRANCH, CODE 300. DELIVERABLES TO BE DEVELOPED IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE TASKED SUPPORT INCLUDE REQUESTS FOR ACTION (RFAS), TRIP REPORTS, WRITTEN INPUTS TO FINAL REVIEW BOARD SUMMARY REPORTS, AND FINAL DISPOSITION OF RFAS ONCE ACCEPTABLE RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED FROM THE PROJECT. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: THE ASSIGNED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SERVING ON THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW BOARD SHALL PARTICIPATE WITH OTHER NASA, CIVIL SERVANT, MILITARY, AND CONTRACTED BOARD MEMBERS WITH THE SAME AND/OR DIVERSE PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL EXPERTISE. THE SELECTED BOARD MEMBER SHALL COMMIT TO PARTICIPATION IN EVERY BRANCH REVIEW TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGHOUT THE LIFECYCLE OF THE MISSION. WHEN POSSIBLE, A NOTIFICATION OF 30-DAYS OR GREATER SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE BOARD MEMBER WHEN PARTICIPATION AT A SPECIFIC REVIEW IS NOT POSSIBLE. SPECIFIC REVIEW SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: REVIEW PREPARATION, COORDINATE WITH SYSTEM REVIEW BRANCH ON REVIEW AGENDA AND ACTIVITIES, COORDINATE WITH THE BRANCH TO SUPPORT REVIEW AGENDA, TIMING, DURATION AND CONTENT. COORDINATE WITH THE BRANCH AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN IDENTIFYING APPROPRIATE REVIEW TEAM MEMBERS SUPPORT BRANCH REVIEW CHAIR OR PROJECT AS SCHEDULING AND/OR MANAGEMENT EXPERT, SUPPORT PEER REVIEWS AND BRANCH REVIEWS VIA TELECOM OR TRAVEL AS REQUIRED, REVIEW OF PROJECT-PROVIDED MATERIALS IN ADVANCE (AS AVAILABLE), PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW EXERCISE RECOGNIZED LEADERSHIP DURING DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE MILESTONE REVIEWS AS A DESIGNATED EXPERT, PREPARE AND SUBMIT REQUESTS FOR ACTIONS (RFA'S) DURING REVIEWS, PLAN TRAVEL AND IMPLEMENT TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS RELATIVE TO THE VENUE FOR EACH REVIEW, ATTEND FOLLOW-UP CAUCUS OF THE REVIEW TEAM FOLLOWING EACH REVIEW, PREPARE AND/OR COMMENT ON SECTIONS OF REVIEW REPORT PERTINENT TO EXPERTISE, FOLLOW-UP, EVALUATE, AND RECORD DISPOSITION OF PROJECT RESPONSES TO RFAS, SUPPORT BRANCH REVIEW CHAIR AS EXPERT AT RELEVANT TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS AND TELECONS, SUPPORT OF TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETINGS AS NECESSARY, FOR EACH DESIGNATED REVIEW, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THE TABLE IN SECTION 4. IT SHALL BE ASSUMED THAT THE DURATION OF EACH REVIEW WILL BE THREE DAYS. IT SHALL FURTHER BE ASSUMED THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SPEND UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO EACH REVIEW FOR PREPARATION AND TRAVEL TO THE REVIEW SITE, AND UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS FOLLOWING EACH REVIEW TO ACCOMPLISH THE POST REVIEW ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3.3.
80ARC022F0013THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.08K
2022-02-222022-09-30541715THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERING/SCIENTIFIC SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NASA SMALL SPACECRAFT VIRTUAL INSTITUTE (S3VI) IN DEVELOPING PLANS AND PLAN OPTIONS FOR A NEW INSTITUTE WEB PORTAL.
693KA925F00021THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Transportation$30.06K
2024-11-132025-08-06541715SEAS PROJECT - COMPLETION OF INTERNATIONAL LAUNCH PLAYBOOK
80ARC017F0004THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$30.04K
2017-08-042017-12-31541712IGF::OT::IGFSTARLING PHASE-A PROJECT SUPPORT
NNM12AA72TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.96K
2012-09-122014-04-23541690SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND COST AND SCHEDULE ANALYSIS SUPPORT
80HQTR24F0013THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.94K
2023-11-272024-02-08541715IRAD RAPID ASSESSMENT FOR NASA'S CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST.OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY, POLICY, AND STRATEGY.
DOCSB134108SE0035THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONDepartment of Commerce$29.82K
2007-12-182007-11-09541690ASSESSMENT SERVICES.
NNL10AB24TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.64K
2010-03-092010-08-31541330THE NESC IS FORMING A TEAM TO ASSESS THE FLIGHT BATTERY THAT IS CURRENTLY OPERATING ABOARD NASA WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE. THE TEAM WILL INVESTIGATE THE ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR OF THE WMAP BATTERY EXPERIENCED TO DATE AND EVALUATE WHAT, IF ANY, ALTERNATIVE OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS CAN BE SAFELY ADOPTED TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONAL LIFETIME OF THE WMAP SPACECRAFT. THE EVALUATION IS EXPECTED TO CONSIST OF REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE DATA AND AVAILABLE BATTERY PARAMETERS; IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTION OF ADDITIONAL DATA, TESTS, OR MODELING REQUIRED TO DEVELOP AND UNDERSTAND THE PRESENT STATE OF THE WMAP BATTERY; PERFORMANCE OF A COMPARABLE STRESS AND DESTRUCTIVE PHYSICAL ANALYSIS (DPA) ON ANY AVAILABLE WMAP FLIGHT LOT CELL; IMPLEMENTATION OF ADDITIONAL ON-ORBIT PERFORMANCE TESTS, IF NEEDED AND POSSIBLE; AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STAKEHOLDER TO ASSIST IN EXTENDING THE ON-ORBIT LIFE OF THE WMAP BATTERY. THE TEAM WILL PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BATTERY OPERATIONS TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF IMPACTING WMAP SCIENCE OPERATIONS FOR THE REST OF THE PROJECT S MISSION. THE INTEGRATED TEAM WILL COORDINATE AND PREPARE FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND OBSERVATIONS INTO A FINAL TEAM REPORT.
80ARC020F0052THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.58K
2020-07-272022-09-30541715THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERING/SCIENTIFIC SERVICES TO INCLUDE LABORATORY/CLEANROOM DESIGN EXPERTISE, PLANETARY PROTECTION, CONTAMINATION AND STERILITY CONTROL,INSTRUMENT INTEGRATION AND TEST PLANNING,SAFETY PLANNING,AND FACILITY ANALYSIS.
NNL05AC92TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.56K
2005-08-222006-09-30541330GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT PROJECT NON-ADVOCATE REVIEW (NAR)
NNM12AA35TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$29.22K
2012-03-162013-01-31541690AEROSPACE TASK #3 TO NNM12AA01B, ENTITLED "EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MISSION ASSURANCE LAUNCH COLLISION AVOIDANCE (COLA)"
NNM17AA13TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$28.41K
2017-01-122017-05-17541690IGF::OT::IGF PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT&TECHNICAL EXPERT SUPPORT OF NUCLEAR THERMAL PROPULSION (NTP).
80HQTR25F7089THE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$28.16K
2025-04-142025-09-30541715RADAR SME SUPPORT FOR VENSAR
NNG11VN06TTHE AEROSPACE CORPORATIONNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$28.15K
2011-09-152011-12-31541712THE TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC REVIEWS SUPPORTED BY THIS TASK ARE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CONDUCTING, MANAGING, EVALUATING, AND APPROVING SPACE FLIGHT PROJECTS. IN COORDINATION WITH THE ICESAT-2 PROJECT, THE GSFC CONDUCTS INTERNAL REVIEWS USING GODDARD SYSTEM REVIEW TEAMS (GSRTS) TO ASSESS THE PROJECT'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT BASELINE. THE INTERNAL REVIEWS ARE THE DECISIONAL MEETINGS WHEREIN THE PROJECTS SOLIDIFY THEIR PLANS, TECHNICAL APPROACHES, AND PROGRAMMATIC COMMITMENTS. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED AS PART OF THE NORMAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING WORK PROCESSES OF THE CENTER. AT THESE REVIEWS, MAJOR TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC REQUIREMENTS ARE ASSESSED ALONG WITH THE SYSTEM DESIGN AND OTHER IMPLEMENTATION PLANS. MAJOR TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC PERFORMANCE METRICS ARE ALSO REPORTED AND ASSESSED AGAINST PREDICTIONS. THE GSRT REVIEWS ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF (A) THE REQUIREMENTS AND THEIR FLOW-DOWN, (B) THE PROJECT ALIGNMENT WITH AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO AGENCY NEEDS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES, (C) THE TECHNICAL APPROACH, (D) THE SCHEDULE, (E) THE ESTIMATED COSTS, (F) RESOURCES OTHER THAN BUDGET, (G) THE RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND RISK IDENTIFICATION/MITIGATION, AND (H) THE MANAGEMENT APPROACH. SUPPORT IS REQUIRED FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CONDUCTED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE OF THE ICESAT-2 MISSION, INCLUDING MISSION ELEMENTS SUCH AS THE SPACECRAFT, INSTRUMENTS, AND GROUND SYSTEMS. IN MANY CASES, THE SYSTEMS UNDER REVIEW REPRESENT MAJOR ADVANCES IN STATE-OF-THE-ART DESIGNS, TECHNIQUES AND OPERATING ENVIRONMENTS WHICH HAVE NO PRECEDENCE. IN SUPPORT OF THIS TASK, SENIOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERS ARE BEING CONTRACTED FOR IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW PANEL POSITIONS REQUIRING PRIMARY EXPERTISE IN AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DISCIPLINES: LASER SYSTEMS, MISSION DESIGN, MISSION SYSTEMS, SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS, MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, COMMAND AND DATA HANDLING SYSTEMS, RF SYSTEMS, POWER SYSTEMS, ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS, THERMAL SYSTEMS, PROPULSION SYSTEMS, INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS, SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND TEST, OPERATIONS, SCIENCE DATA SYSTEMS, OR FLIGHT AND GROUND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PARTICIPATION OF THEIR SENIOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERS WITH THE NASA TASK MONITOR REGARDING SPECIFIC DISCIPLINES OF INTEREST REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE REVIEWS, ACCORDING TO THE IDENTIFIED CONCERNS AND DEVELOPMENTAL STATUS OF THE PROJECT.